The Ethical Dilemma of Populism: Lessons from the Trial of Jesus (03/16/'24) -Statement

The Ethical Dilemma of Populism: Lessons from the Trial of Jesus The Bible verses below referenced are all related to the trial and crucifixion of Jesus Christ, and they showcase instances where leaders were influenced by public opinion or crowd pressure rather than adhering to their own judgments or moral convictions. Let's examine each verse to understand the context: Luke 23:4, 14: In these verses, Pilate declares to the chief priests and the crowds that he finds no basis for a charge against Jesus. Despite this, the chief priests and people continue to demand Jesus' crucifixion, showcasing how the leaders and the crowd are at odds, with the leader attempting to follow a sense of justice, but the crowd demanding action based on their desires. Matthew 27:19: Here, Pilate's wife sends him a message, saying, "Don’t have anything to do with that innocent man, for I have suffered a great deal today in a dream because of him." This verse highlights an individual's attempt to intervene with a warning based on a personal conviction or revelation, which is contrary to the public demand for Jesus' crucifixion. John 18:38: Pilate asks Jesus, "What is truth?" after Jesus says that He came into the world to testify to the truth. This moment reflects Pilate's personal contemplation of justice and truth, contrasting with the external pressures he faces. The problem with populism, as illustrated by these verses, lies in the potential for the will of the majority (or a vocal minority) to override justice, truth, and individual conscience. Populism often emphasizes the desires and interests of "the people" against a perceived elite or establishment, which can sometimes lead to just decisions being overridden by the popular or more appealing choice among the masses. The verses suggest a caution against yielding to crowd demands without discernment of justice, truth, and morality. The basis for a charge against populism, then, can be seen as the risk of undermining justice and truth for the sake of appeasing the majority or for leaders to maintain their favor with the populace. It raises the ethical question of whether decisions should be guided by what is popular or by what is right, especially when the two are in conflict. Pastor Steven G. Lee (March 16, 2024)