Title: Interpreting Myths: Beyond Cosmology to Human Existence (06/05/'24) -Passage

Interpreting Myths: Beyond Cosmology to Human Existence Myths should not be understood as explanations of the universe or the cosmos (cosmological terms) but rather as reflections of human experience and existence (anthropological or existentialist terms). Clarification and Explanation Cosmological Terms: Interpreting myth in cosmological terms means seeing myths as ways to explain the origins, structure, and workings of the universe and natural phenomena. Anthropological Terms: Interpreting myth in anthropological terms suggests that myths should be understood as expressions of human culture, social structures, and behaviors. Existentialist Terms: Interpreting myth in existentialist terms implies that myths are best understood as narratives that explore fundamental human concerns, such as the nature of existence, the search for meaning, and individual human experiences. Reasoning The reason given in the sentence is implicit rather than explicitly stated. It implies that myths are more about human experiences and existential questions than about explaining the physical world. This perspective is rooted in the idea that myths provide insights into human nature, emotions, and existential dilemmas rather than serving as primitive scientific explanations. To summarize, the sentence is making a case for interpreting myths as expressions of human and existential experiences rather than as explanations of the cosmos. The reason for this interpretation is that myths are believed to address the deeper aspects of human life and existence rather than merely describing natural phenomena. Pastor Steven G. Lee (June 5, 2024)